There's a common refrain these days that there just aren't enough original stories being told anymore. Usually this is just pointing out how sick to death we are of our only options at the modern cinema being sequels and remakes. However, the refrain tends to also imply to some degree that there is no value in stories that are unoriginal or at least that such stories are inferior.
This is patently false.
For evidence of that, look no further than The Void. It's a pretty standard protocol to describe a movie as "X meets Y" in order to give an audience a good idea of what to expect. You see this a lot in pull quotes. Oftentimes it isn't even all that accurate, but The Void could easily be sold as "Prince of Darkness meets The Thing and The Beyond" and it would be totally accurate.
The amazing thing is that that is not selling the movie short or criticizing it for being derivative. This is a perfect example of how to take well-known elements and mix them together into a genuinely good film.
We open as a man we'll later come to know as James (Evan Stern) flees from a farmhouse in the woods, with a door marked with a dark triangle. It's pretty clear something awful has been going on inside, but that's made crystal clear when a screaming woman rushes out, too. Unfortunately, she is shot by a man we'll later learn is Vincent (Daniel Fathers) and his seemingly mute son Simon (Mik Byskov). Vincent douses the wounded woman in gasoline and sets her on fire, promising Simon that James won't get far.
"I have got to find a better excuse for dramatically lighting cigarettes." |
Which means that there's an actual reason for the hospital being deserted, unlike many horror films.
It's a bit awkward for Daniel, though, because his estranged wife, Allison Fraser (Kathleen Munroe) works there as a nurse. The only other staff at the place at this time are Dr. Richard Powell (Kenneth Welsh), nurse Beverly (Stephanie Belding), and intern Kim (Ellen Wong). Kim is keeping a patient named Cliff (Matthew Kennedy) company in his bed when she is called to the front to assist Beverly with the files. Meanwhile, pregnant young woman Maggie (Grace Munro) and her grandfather Ben (James Millington) have arrived at the place in order to get Maggie a check-up.
When Daniel brings James in, the young man's behavior makes the staff suspect drugs are in his system and he has to be sedated. While Daniel is trying to call in to his office to update them, he happens upon the shocking scene of an entranced Beverely stabbing Cliff to death with scissors. Even worse, she has already cut off most of her own face. In a panic, Daniel shoots her dead.
"There, did that help with your headache?" |
Daniel manages to escape the cultist, but he is wounded badly. Worse, everyone sees now that a huge mob of robed figures has surrounded the hospital.
"I don't think these guys are here for the Trump rally..." |
So now they're not only trapped in the hospital by the cultists, but they're trapped in there with whatever Beverly has become. And when Vincent and Simon fight their way into the hospital, things naturally manage to get even worse...
"Tentacles. Why is it always tentacles?" |
And, in some ways, it actually even improves on the elements it borrows. Much as I love Prince of Darkness, I think this film does a better job with a few of the set-pieces it copies.
What's more, it's always great to see a film that properly utilizes practical effects but also understands the benefits of said effects. There are a few moments of CGI in this film, in fact, because the filmmakers clearly understood what effects made the most sense for which parts.
I obviously left a lot out of my summary here, because I feel this is a film that really deserves to be seen with fresh eyes. It may not have very many surprises for the veteran horror viewer, but those it has are well worth being experienced on their own terms.
I genuinely hope that we will be seeing more horror movies like this in the years to come.
Welcome to the Day Twenty-Two of Hubri5Ween 2017, the fifth year of this nonsense! Click the banner above to see what everyone else did for V!
Your opening paragraphs are a perfect summary of why this movie is good. As I explained to a fellow horror buff, all of the individual components of the movie are lifted from other horror movies, often quite blatantly--but the way these components are woven together is original and well-done, elevating this movie from a rip-off to a loving homage, and an thorough enjoyable horror movie in its own right.
ReplyDeleteOh, and I agree about Prince of Darkness. Carpenter and Fulci were horror geniuses, and at their best both PoD and The Beyond manage to evoke the sense of a nightmare better than The Void. However, both movies are much less coherent; The Void manages to retain a high level of coherence while still evoking some of the nighmarish quality of its predecessors. The net result is that The Void is far more watchable and accessible. If I were introducing someone to the horror genre, I'd start with The Void, and then work up to Prince of Darkness or In the Mouth of Madness, which is brilliant but challenging.
ReplyDeleteThe Thing, on the other hand, is an unequivocal masterpiece, as is Halloween. One wonders what the heck happened to Carpenter after ItMoM, I can't think of another director who had such a sudden and complete decline.